Capacidades de Innovación de los estudiantes de ingeniería: Caso de una universidad pública del noreste de México
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58299/edu.v30i35.504Palabras clave:
Capacidad de Innovación, Innovación, Instituciones de Educación Superior, Regresión LinealResumen
El objetivo de este estudio es identificar la relación entre las habilidades y conocimientos desarrollados en los futuros egresados y la capacidad de innovación. Se diseñó un instrumento en escala de Likert que cumplió con los criterios de confiabilidad, mediante un análisis de consistencia interna, obteniendo valores superiores a 0.7 en cada una de las variables. En cuanto la validez del instrumento, este se elaboró mediante una revisión exhaustiva y sistemática de la literatura, adaptando los ítems de cada variable y solicitando a expertos en el área la revisión de este. El instrumento se aplicó a una muestra aleatoria de 316 estudiantes del último año de estudios de ingeniería. El análisis de regresión lineal encontró que todas las variables tienen una relación significativa a excepción de la variable conocimientos técnicos en ingeniería, lo cual indica que la capacidad de innovación no es exclusiva de esta área.
Citas
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. (2016). Engineering Accreditation Commission. In Criteria for accrediting engineering programs: Effective for Reviews During the 2017-2018 Accreditation Cycle. http://www.abet.org/Linked Documents-UPDATE/Criteria and PP/C001 08-09 CAC Criteria 11-8-07.pdf
Adelstein, J., & Clegg, S. (2016). Code of Ethics: A Stratified Vehicle for Compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2581-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2581-9
Bäckström, I., & Bengtsson, L. (2019). A mapping study of employee innovation: proposing a research agenda. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(3), 468–492. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2018-0101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2018-0101
Brito, J. A. M. de. (2021). Judgement in geotechnical engineering practice. Soils and Rocks, 33(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.28927/SR.2021.063821 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28927/SR.2021.063821
Bysted, R. (2013). Innovative employee behaviour: The moderating effects of mental involvement and job satisfaction on contextual variables. European Journal of Innovation Management, 16(3), 268–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2011-0069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2011-0069
Capobianco-Uriarte, M. de las M., Casado-Belmonte, M. del P., Marín-Carrillo, G. M., & Terán-Yépez, E. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of international competitiveness (1983-2017). Sustainability, 11(7), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071877 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071877
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press. https://cutt.ly/pPHdnBb
Dmitrieva, E. O., & Guseva, M. S. (2019). Accounting for the Digitalization Factor in Assessing Territorial Competitiveness. SHS Web of Conferences, 62, 13003. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196213003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196213003
Duradoni, M., & Di Fabio, A. (2019). Intrapreneurial self-capital and sustainable innovative behavior within organizations. Sustainability, 11(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020322
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (2004). Análisis Multivariante (1999 Madrid: Pearson Prentice Hall (ed.)). https://cutt.ly/XPHo4op
Harwiki, W., & Choiron, A. (2018). Batik creative industry: Creativity, innovation y competitiveness to encounter global market. Journal of Business and Finance in Emerging Markets, 1(2), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.32770 / jbfem.vol1189-196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32770/jbfem.vol1189-196
Höflinger, P. J., Nagel, C., & Sandner, P. (2018). Reputation for technological innovation: Does it actually cohere with innovative activity? Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 3(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.08.002
IBM Corp. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics para Windows, (versión 25.0). Armonk, Nueva York: IBM Corp. https://cutt.ly/cFJck8n
Khalil, S. R., & Mehmood, K. K. (2018). Knowledge Management, Emotional Capability, Teamwork, and Innovativeness: Mediating Role of Organizational Learning. Review of Economics and Development Studies, 4(2), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.26710/reads.v4i2.407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26710/reads.v4i2.407
Kirn, A., & Benson, L. (2018). Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Problem Solving and Their Future. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(1), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20190
MacLeod, I. A. (2010). The education of innovative engineers. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 17(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981011011294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981011011294
Manta, P. D. O. (2019). The role of competitiveness on the sustainability of the national real economy. The Journal Contemporary Economy, 4, 138-46. https://www.academia.edu/download/63330300/article_Dr._Otilia_MANTA20200516-55850-xrsa4q.pdf
Putra, S., & Fibra, A. (2016). Teamwork as an innovation generator: An analysis of project hatchery at Binus university international. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 24(July), 139–154. https://cutt.ly/TPHpCok
Rampersad, G. (2020). Robot will take your job: Innovation for an era of artificial intelligence. Journal of Business Research, 116(May), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.019
Rositas, J. (2014). Los tamaños de las muestras en encuestas de las ciencias sociales y su repercusion en la generacion del conocimiento (Sample sizes for social science surveys and impact on knowledge generation). Innovaciones de Negocios, 11(2), 235–268. http://www.web.facpya.uanl.mx/rev_in/Revistas/11_22/11.22 Art4 pp 235 - 268.pdf
Roy, S., Dan, P. K., & Modak, N. (2018). Effect of teamwork culture on NPD team’s capability in Indian engineering manufacturing sector. Management Science Letters, 8(7), 767–784. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2018.5.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2018.5.009
Sepashvili, E. (2020). Supporting Digitalization: Key Goal for National Competitiveness in Digital Global Economy. Economia Aziendale Online, 11(2), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.13132/2038-5498/11.2.191-198
Shu, E. (Emily). (2020). A problem-solving process for developing capabilities: the case of an established firm. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(4), 713–727. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2018-0262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2018-0262
Thongsri, N., & Chang, A. K. H. (2019). Interactions among factors influencing product innovation and innovation behaviour: Market orientation, managerial ties, and government support. Sustainability, 11(10). 27-93 https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102793
Ueki, Y., & Guaita Martínez, J. M. (2020). The impact of engineers’ skills and problem-solving abilities on process innovation. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 33(1), 2018–2037. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1596826 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1596826
Veiga, P. M., Teixeira, S. J., Figueiredo, R., & Fernandes, C. I. (2020). Entrepreneurship, innovation and competitiveness: A public institution love triangle. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 72(May), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100863 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100863
Weedon, S. (2019). The role of rhetoric in engineering judgment. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 62(2), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2019.2900824 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2019.2900824
Yang, M., & Han, C. (2021). Stimulating innovation: Managing peer interaction for idea generation on digital innovation platforms. Journal of Business Research, 125(August), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.005
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 EDUCATECONCIENCIA
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.