Uso de las TIC para la generación y divulgación de conocimiento científico por estudiantes universitarios

Alejandro Ruiz Bernés, Salvador Ruiz Bernés, Verónica Benítez Guerrero, Aurelio Flores García

Resumen


El ejercicio de la alfabetización científica del estudiante de nivel superior se proyecta mediante la práctica profesional, en la que se involucran las tecnologías de la información y comunicación para innovar. El objetivo del trabajo fue identificar las TIC utilizadas para la generación y divulgación de conocimiento científico por estudiantes universitarios. Se aplicó un instrumento con 69 reactivos de los que se sustrajeron 2 secciones que caracterizan el uso de las TIC y la forma en que se genera y divulga el conocimiento científico. La muestra fue no probabilística de tipo homogénea conformada por 439 estudiantes. Los resultados se presentaron mediante estadística descriptiva (frecuencias, proporciones, tasas e intervalos de confianza). Se concluye que las TIC han sido poco aprovechadas por los estudiantes, resultando poca generación de conocimiento, innovación y divulgación.

Palabras clave


TIC, nivel superior, divulgación, conocimiento científico

Texto completo:

PDF XML

Referencias


Acord, S. K., & Harley, D. (2013). Credit, time, and personality: The human challenges to sharing scholarly work using Web 2.0. New Media & Society, 15(3), 379-397. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461444812465140. doi:10.1177/1461444812465140

Anderson, L. M., Brownson, R. C., Fullilove, M. T., Teutsch, S. M., Novick, L. F., Fielding, J., & Land, G. H. (2005). Evidence-Based Public Health Policy and Practice: Promises and Limits. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(5), 226-230. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.02.014. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2005.02.014

Atherton, H., Huckvale, C., & Car, J. (2010). Communicating health promotion and disease prevention information to patients via email: a review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 16(4), 172-175. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1258/jtt.2010.004002. doi:10.1258/jtt.2010.004002

Backer, T. E. (1991). Knowledge Utilization:The Third Wave. Knowledge, 12(3), 225-240. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/107554709101200303. doi:10.1177/107554709101200303

Banks, M. A. (2006). Towards a continuum of scholarship: The eventual collapse of the distinction between grey and non-grey literature. Publishing Research Quarterly, 22(1), 4-11. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-006-0002-8. doi:10.1007/s12109-006-0002-8

Bergman, S. S. (2006). The scholarly communication movement: highlights and recent developments. Collection Building, 25(4), 108-128.

Björk, B.-C. (2007). A model of scientifitc communication of a global distributed information system.

Blake, S. C., & Ottoson, J. M. (2009). Knowledge utilization: Implications for evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2009(124), 21-34. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ev.311. doi:10.1002/ev.311

Bus, A. G., de Jong, M. T., Verhallen, M., & van der Kooy-Hofland, V. A. (2008). Design features in living books and their effects on young children’s vocabulary. Educating the other America, 263-276.

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). Learning by viewing versus learning by doing: Evidence-based guidelines for principled learning environments. Performance Improvement, 47(9), 5-13. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pfi.20028. doi:10.1002/pfi.20028

Collins, E., & Hide, B. (2010). Use and relevance of Web 2.0 resources for researchers. Paper presented at the ELPUB.

Correia, A. M. R., & de Castro Neto, M. (2002). The role of eprint archives in the access to, and dissemination of, scientific grey literature: LIZA - a case study by the National Libraryof Portugal. Journal of Information Science, 28(3), 231-241. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/016555150202800305. doi:10.1177/016555150202800305

Dearing, J. W., & Kreuter, M. W. (2010). Designing for diffusion: How can we increase uptake of cancer communication innovations? Patient Education and Counseling, 81, S100-S110. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073839911000621X. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.013

Dearing, J. W., Maibach, E. W., & Buller, D. B. (2006). A Convergent Diffusion and Social Marketing Approach for Disseminating Proven Approaches to Physical Activity Promotion. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31(4, Supplement), 11-23. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379706002297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.06.018

DelliFraine, J. L., & Dansky, K. H. (2008). Home-based telehealth: a review and meta-analysis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 14(2), 62-66. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1258/jtt.2007.070709. doi:10.1258/jtt.2007.070709

Dunn, W. N., & Holzner, B. (1988). Knowledge in society: anatomy of an emergent field. Knowledge in Society, 1(1), 3. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03177545. doi:10.1007/bf03177545

Economist (The). (2008). User-generated science. Web 2.0 tools are beginning to change the shape of scientific debate. The Economist. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2008/09/18/user-generated-science

Edejer, T. T.-T. (2000). Disseminating health information in developing countries: the role of the internet. BMJ, 321(7264), 797-800. Retrieved from https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/321/7264/797.full.pdf. doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7264.797

Estabrooks, C. A., Thompson, D. S., Lovely, J. J. E., & Hofmeyer, A. (2006). A guide to knowledge translation theory. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 25-36. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/chp.48. doi:10.1002/chp.48

Eysenbach, G. (2008). Medicine 2.0: Social Networking, Collaboration, Participation, Apomediation, and Openness. J Med Internet Res, 10(3), e22. Retrieved from http://www.jmir.org/2008/3/e22/; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18725354. doi:10.2196/jmir.1030

Eysenbach, G., Sa, E. R., & Diepgen, T. L. (1999). Shopping around the internet today and tomorrow: towards the millennium of cybermedicine. BMJ, 319(7220), 1294. Retrieved from https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/319/7220/1294.full.pdf. doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7220.1294

Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Hershkovitz, A. (2012). A case study of Israeli higher-education institutes sharing scholarly information with the community via social networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 58-68. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751611000534. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.08.003

Gee, J. P. (2008). Good videogames, the human mind, and good learning. In Children's learning in a digital world. (pp. 40-63). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

Green, L. W., Ottoson, J. M., García, C., & Hiatt, R. A. (2009). Diffusion Theory and Knowledge Dissemination, Utilization, and Integration in Public Health. Annual Review of Public Health, 30(1), 151-174. Retrieved from https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100049. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100049

Griffiths, F., Lindenmeyer, A., Powell, J., Lowe, P., & Thorogood, M. (2006). Why Are Health Care Interventions Delivered Over the Internet? A Systematic Review of the Published Literature. J Med Internet Res, 8(2), e10. Retrieved from http://www.jmir.org/2006/2/e10/; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16867965. doi:10.2196/jmir.8.2.e10

Gu, F., & Widén‐Wulff, G. (2011). Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media: A Finnish case study. The Electronic Library, 29(6), 762-776. Retrieved from https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/02640471111187999. doi:doi:10.1108/02640471111187999

Hawn, C. (2009). Take Two Aspirin And Tweet Me In The Morning: How Twitter, Facebook, And Other Social Media Are Reshaping Health Care. Health Affairs, 28(2), 361-368. Retrieved from https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/abs/10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.361. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.361

Hendriks, P. (2007). STM Publishing in a Changing World. SIIA Global Information Industry Summit. Retrieved from http://www.siia.net/giis/2007/ppt/hendricks.pdf.

Houghton, J., & Vickery, G. (2005). Digital Broadband Content: Scientific Publishing (DSTI/ICCP/IE(2004)11/FINAL). Retrieved from Paris: http://vuir.vu.edu.au/4773/

Hutton, G. R. (2010). Understanding influence of scientific information in the digital age: A study of the grey literature of a United Nations advisory group. Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science (NSIS), 45(2).

Jadad, A. R., Haynes, R. B., Hunt, D., & Browman, G. P. (2000). The Internet and evidence-based decision-making: a needed synergy for efficient knowledge management in health care. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 162(3), 362-365. Retrieved from http://www.cmaj.ca/content/cmaj/162/3/362.full.pdf.

Karemaker, A., Pitchford, N. J., & O’Malley, C. (2010). Enhanced recognition of written words and enjoyment of reading in struggling beginner readers through whole-word multimedia software. Computers & Education, 54(1), 199-208. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131509001985. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.018

Katz, E. (1999). Theorizing Diffusion: Tarde and Sorokin Revisited. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566(1), 144-155. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/000271629956600112. doi:10.1177/000271629956600112

Kingdon, J. W., & Thurber, J. A. (2013). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd. ed.). Harlow, United Kingdom: Pearson.

Korp, P. (2005). Health on the Internet: implications for health promotion. Health Education Research, 21(1), 78-86. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyh043. doi:10.1093/her/cyh043

Lavis, J. N., Robertson, D., Woodside, J. M., McLeod, C. B., & Abelson, J. (2003). How Can Research Organizations More Effectively Transfer Research Knowledge to Decision Makers? The Milbank Quarterly, 81(2), 221-248. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00052. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00052

Lawrence, A. (2012). Electronic Documents in a Print World: Grey Literature and the Internet. Media International Australia, 143(1), 122-131. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1329878X1214300114. doi:10.1177/1329878x1214300114

Lawrence, P. A. (2003). The politics of publication. Nature, 422(6929), 259.

Leonard, D. A. (2011). Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Manag Knowl Assets, Creat Innovs, 17, 429.

Madras, G. (2008). Scientific publishing: Rising cost of monopolies. Current Science, 95(2), 163-164.

Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning: Cambridge university press.

Nentwich, M., & König, R. (2014). Academia Goes Facebook? The Potential of Social Network Sites in the Scholarly Realm. In S. Bartling & S. Friesike (Eds.), Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing (pp. 107-124). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

O'Dell, C., & Grayson, C. J. (1998). If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices. California Management Review, 40(3), 154-174. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.2307/41165948. doi:10.2307/41165948

Pardelli, G., Goggi, S., & Sassi, M. (2012). Grey literature between tradition and innovation: is there a continuum? Paper presented at the Thirteenth International Conference on Grey Literature: The Grey Circuit, From Social Networking to Wealth Creation.

Procter, R., Williams, R., Stewart, J., Poschen, M., Snee, H., Voss, A., & Asgari-Targhi, M. (2010). Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368(1926), 4039-4056. Retrieved from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rsta.2010.0155. doi:doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0155

Roosendaal, H. E., Huibers, T. W., Geurts, P. A. T. M., & van der Vet, P. E. (2003). Changes in the value chain of scientific information: economic consequences for academic institutions. Online information review, 27(2), 120-128.

Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., Gordin, D. N., & Means, B. M. (2000). Changing How and What Children Learn in School with Computer-Based Technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76-101. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1602690. doi:10.2307/1602690

Seymour, D. J. (2010). Sanctioned Inequity and Accessibility Issues in the Grey Literature in the United States. Archaeologies, 6(2), 233-269. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-010-9144-6. doi:10.1007/s11759-010-9144-6

Shirky, C. (2009). Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. New York, USA: Penguin Press.

Swing, E., & Anderson, C. (2008). How and What do Videogames Teach? In (pp. 64-84).

Takacs, Z. K., Swart, E. K., & Bus, A. G. (2015). Benefits and Pitfalls of Multimedia and Interactive Features in Technology-Enhanced Storybooks:A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 698-739. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/0034654314566989. doi:10.3102/0034654314566989

Tuerk, P. W., Fortney, J., Bosworth, H. B., Wakefield, B., Ruggiero, K. J., Acierno, R., & Frueh, B. C. (2010). Toward the Development of National Telehealth Services: The Role of Veterans Health Administration and Future Directions for Research. Telemedicine and e-Health, 16(1), 115-117. Retrieved from https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/tmj.2009.0144. doi:10.1089/tmj.2009.0144

Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Effects of Feedback in a Computer-Based Learning Environment on Students’ Learning Outcomes:A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 475-511. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/0034654314564881. doi:10.3102/0034654314564881

Weiss, C. H., Bucuvalas, M. J., & Bucuvalas, M. J. (1980). Social science research and decision-making: Columbia University Press.

Whitworth, B., & Friedman, R. (2009a). Reinventing academic publishing online. Part I: Rigor, relevance and practice. First Monday, 14(8). Retrieved from https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2609/2248.

Whitworth, B., & Friedman, R. (2009b). Reinventing academic publishing online. Part II: A socio-technical vision. First Monday, 14(9). Retrieved from https://ojphi.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2642/2287.

Wild, M. (2000). Designing and evaluating an educational performance support system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 5-20. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-8535.00131. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00131


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.