Acceso a Internet en Adolescentes mexicanos: ENSANUT 2012 y 2016, estudio comparativo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58299/edu.v19i20.62Palabras clave:
Acceso a Internet, brecha digital, ENSANUT, adolescentesResumen
Actualmente existe un incremento en el acceso a Internet entre adolescentes, misma
que ha disminuido la brecha digital en México comparado con otros países desarrollados,
impactando en una mejora en la inclusión social. Se consultaron las bases de datos
generadas por la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2012 y 2016 para analizar las
variables: acceso a Internet, posesión y uso de computadora o laptop y celular. El estudio es
no experimental, transversal descriptivo. Se analizaron 28239 registros de hogares en que
habitan adolescentes. Al comparar los estratos de adolescentes entre 2012 y 2016 resultaron
con menor acceso a Internet, posesión y uso de computadora o laptop y celular
Citas
Assembly, U. G. (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration: Resolution adopted by
the General Assembly. 55/2. 18 September 2000. New York: United Nations.
Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the „digital natives‟ debate: Towards a more
nuanced understanding of students' technology experiences. Journal of computer
assisted learning, 26(5), 321-331.
Bilbao-Osorio, B., Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B. (2013). The global information technology
report 2013. Paper presented at the World Economic Forum.
Acceso a Internet en Adolescentes mexicanos: ENSANUT 2012 y 2016, estudio comparativo
Alejandro Ruiz Bernés, Salvador Ruiz Bernés, Aurelio Flores García y Hernán Leo Rodríguez González
Revista EDUCATECONCIENCIA. Vol. 19, No. 20. Publicación trimestral julio - septiembre 2018
Bonfadelli, H. (2002). The Internet and knowledge gaps: A theoretical and empirical DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323102017001607
investigation. European Journal of Communication, 17(1), 65-84.
Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From production to
produsage: Peter Lang.
Clark, L. S. (2009). Digital media and the generation gap: Qualitative research on US teens DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180902823845
and their parents. Information, Communication & Society, 12(3), 388-407.
Haddon, L. (2000). Social exclusion and information and communication technologies: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614440022225878
Lessons from studies of single parents and the young elderly. New media & society,
(4), 387-406.
Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). The participation divide: Content creation and sharing DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801946150
in the digital age. Information, Community and Society, 11(2), 239-256.
Hasebrink, U., Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., & Ólafsson, K. (2009). Comparing children’s
online opportunities and risks across Europe: Cross-national comparisons for EU
Kids Online: EU Kids Online.
Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: where is the evidence? British DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902989227
educational research journal, 36(3), 503-520.
Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting
the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century: Mit
Press.
Kochiro, M. (2002). Director-General of UNESCO: Message. On the occasion of the PanEuropean Regional Ministerial Conference on the preparations for the forthcoming
World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS): Bucharest.
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335
people and the digital divide. New media & society, 9(4), 671-696.
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2006). Adolescents‟ internet use: Testing the “disappearing
digital divide” versus the “emerging digital differentiation” approach. Poetics, 34(4-
, 293-305.
Robinson, L. (2009). A taste for the necessary: A Bourdieuian approach to digital DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180902857678
inequality. Information, Communication & Society, 12(4), 488-507.
Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., . . . Stern, M.
J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication &
Society, 18(5), 569-582.
Tripp, L. M. (2011). „The computer is not for you to be looking around, it is for DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810375293
schoolwork‟: Challenges for digital inclusion as Latino immigrant families negotiate
children‟s access to the internet. New media & society, 13(4), 552-567.
Acceso a Internet en Adolescentes mexicanos: ENSANUT 2012 y 2016, estudio comparativo
Alejandro Ruiz Bernés, Salvador Ruiz Bernés, Aurelio Flores García y Hernán Leo Rodríguez González
Revista EDUCATECONCIENCIA. Vol. 19, No. 20. Publicación trimestral julio - septiembre 2018
Van Deursen, A. J., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). A nuanced understanding of Internet use and
non-use among the elderly. European Journal of Communication, 30(2), 171-187.
Van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2015). Toward a multifaceted model of Internet
access for understanding digital divides: An empirical investigation. The
Information Society, 31(5), 379-391.
Van Deursen, A. J., van Dijk, J. A., & Peter, M. (2015). Increasing inequalities in what we
do online: A longitudinal cross sectional analysis of Internet activities among the
Dutch population (2010 to 2013) over gender, age, education, and income.
Telematics and informatics, 32(2), 259-272.
Van Dijk, J. (2012). The evolution of the digital divide: The digital divide turns to
inequality of skills and usage. Digital enlightenment yearbook, 2012, 57-75.
Witte, J. C., & Mannon, S. E. (2010). The Internet and social inequalities: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861639
Zillien, N., & Hargittai, E. (2009). Digital distinction: Status‐specific types of internet DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00617.x
usage. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 274-291.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 EDUCATECONCIENCIA
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
